Systems Lab

6 alternatives to Twenty

Reviewed by Cheetah Systems Lab research team on 2026-09-24. Competitive set: Modern and developer-facing CRM. The reviewer profile includes the editorial and corrections policy.

Compare Twenty on price and setup. Check Twenty against 6 rivals on developer access, buyer fit and tradeoffs.

Read the Twenty profile

Why teams replace Twenty

Twenty says custom objects, fields, views, and no-code workflows need no developer, but its differentiators (the Apps framework for custom apps and server-side logic, API-first extensibility, and self-hosting) assume someone who can write code or run infrastructure. SSO (SAML/OIDC), row-level permissions, audit logs, and encryption key rotation require the Organization plan ($19/user/mo billed yearly, $25 monthly), and single-tenant isolation, IP allow-listing, SCIM, and a security review and DPA require Enterprise (from $50k/year), so security-conscious teams on a budget will hit a wall quickly. Cloud Pro is also capped at 50 API calls per minute. Self-hosting the free core avoids per-seat cost but shifts hosting, upgrades, and backups onto the team's own infrastructure, and the free self-hosted tier gets community support only.

Twenty current baseline

The repository is mostly licensed under AGPLv3, with certain files under a commercial license and MIT covering the app development toolkit (twenty-sdk, twenty-client-sdk, create-twenty-app, twenty-shared), the twenty-ui component library and the applications under packages/twenty-apps.

  • Custom data modeling: unlimited custom objects, fields, and relations on all plans
  • No-code workflows, views, and automations built from Settings
  • Apps framework (npx create-twenty-app): ship custom objects, server-side logic functions, React components, AI skills and agents, views, and navigation in TypeScript
  • Native MCP server on every Cloud workspace and on self-hosted instances, for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and other MCP clients
  • REST and GraphQL Core API generated per workspace, a Metadata API for managing the data model, webhooks on record create, update, and delete, and OAuth 2.0
Published starting point
$9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free
Setup
30m setup assessment
Developer access
API documentation, MCP documentation

How each alternative compares with Twenty

  • Attio vs Twenty

    Choose Attio when

    Choose Attio over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free, up to 3 seats); 30m setup assessment; Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Attio's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free, up to 3 seats), and Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    Attio versus Twenty on published starting price: Attio - $0 (Free, up to 3 seats); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, Attio has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For Attio versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for Attio versus Twenty, Documentation used for Attio versus Twenty, Pricing used for Attio versus Twenty, API documentation used for Attio versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Attio versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Attio versus Twenty. These Attio sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

  • Close vs Twenty

    Choose Close when

    Choose Close over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $9 per user/month billed annually (Solo; $19 billed monthly); 1h setup assessment; Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Close's 1h setup assessment, $9 per user/month billed annually (Solo; $19 billed monthly), and Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    Close versus Twenty on published starting price: Close - $9 per user/month billed annually (Solo; $19 billed monthly); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, Close has a 1h setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For Close versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for Close versus Twenty, Documentation used for Close versus Twenty, Pricing used for Close versus Twenty, API documentation used for Close versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Close versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Close versus Twenty. These Close sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

  • Day.ai vs Twenty

    Choose Day.ai when

    Choose Day.ai over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0/month (Free); paid agents from $24/month per agent billed annually, or $30/month billed monthly; 1h setup assessment; Day.ai's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Day.ai's 1h setup assessment, $0/month (Free); paid agents from $24/month per agent billed annually, or $30/month billed monthly, and Day.ai's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    Day.ai versus Twenty on published starting price: Day.ai - $0/month (Free); paid agents from $24/month per agent billed annually, or $30/month billed monthly; Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, Day.ai has a 1h setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Day.ai's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For Day.ai versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for Day.ai versus Twenty, Documentation used for Day.ai versus Twenty, Pricing used for Day.ai versus Twenty, API documentation used for Day.ai versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Day.ai versus Twenty. These Day.ai sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

  • folk vs Twenty

    Choose folk when

    Choose folk over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $24/member/mo billed annually (Standard); $30/member/mo billed monthly; 30m setup assessment; folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than folk's 30m setup assessment, $24/member/mo billed annually (Standard); $30/member/mo billed monthly, and folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    folk versus Twenty on published starting price: folk - $24/member/mo billed annually (Standard); $30/member/mo billed monthly; Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, folk has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For folk versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for folk versus Twenty, Documentation used for folk versus Twenty, Pricing used for folk versus Twenty, API documentation used for folk versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for folk versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for folk versus Twenty. These folk sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

  • HubSpot CRM vs Twenty

    Choose HubSpot CRM when

    Choose HubSpot CRM over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (free CRM tools, up to 2 users); 30m setup assessment; HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than HubSpot CRM's 30m setup assessment, $0 (free CRM tools, up to 2 users), and HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    HubSpot CRM versus Twenty on published starting price: HubSpot CRM - $0 (free CRM tools, up to 2 users); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, HubSpot CRM has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, Documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, Pricing used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, API documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty. These HubSpot CRM sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

  • Pipedrive vs Twenty

    Choose Pipedrive when

    Choose Pipedrive over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: US$14 per seat/month billed annually (Lite; US$19 billed monthly); 30m setup assessment; Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free; 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah comparison of published constraints

    Keep Twenty in contention when

    Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free, and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Pipedrive's 30m setup assessment, US$14 per seat/month billed annually (Lite; US$19 billed monthly), and Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

    Cheetah assessment

    Key tradeoff

    Pipedrive versus Twenty on published starting price: Pipedrive - US$14 per seat/month billed annually (Lite; US$19 billed monthly); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Cloud Pro, billed yearly); $12/user/mo billed monthly; self-hosting the core is free. On setup, Pipedrive has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

    Cheetah assessment

    For Pipedrive versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-09-24: Website used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, Documentation used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, Pricing used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, API documentation used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Pipedrive versus Twenty. These Pipedrive sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

Twenty baseline sources

Verify before deciding

  • Named MCP tool list: Twenty's MCP server exposes tools via learn_tools/execute_tool discovery rather than a documented fixed list, so no mcpToolNames were recorded
  • A machine-readable OpenAPI specification was not included in the reviewed source set.

Cheetah assessed Twenty buyer fit, setup and tradeoffs. Shortlist reviewed 2026-07-31.

About Cheetah

Build my GTM engine

Tell us what you want to improve. Fedor reviews the workflow and replies by email when there is a useful fit.

Fedor reviews every request personally. If there is a useful fit, he will reply by email.