6 alternatives to Twenty

How each alternative compares with Twenty

• 

  Attio vs Twenty

  Choose Attio when

  Choose Attio over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free, up to 3 seats); 30m setup assessment; Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Attio's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free, up to 3 seats), and Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Attio versus Twenty on published starting price: Attio - $0 (Free, up to 3 seats); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, Attio has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Attio's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Attio versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-07-30: Website used for Attio versus Twenty, Documentation used for Attio versus Twenty, Pricing used for Attio versus Twenty, API documentation used for Attio versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Attio versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Attio versus Twenty. These Attio sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Close vs Twenty

  Choose Close when

  Choose Close over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $19/mo (Solo, or $9/mo billed annually); 1h setup assessment; Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Close's 1h setup assessment, $19/mo (Solo, or $9/mo billed annually), and Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Close versus Twenty on published starting price: Close - $19/mo (Solo, or $9/mo billed annually); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, Close has a 1h setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Close's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Close versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Close versus Twenty, Documentation used for Close versus Twenty, Pricing used for Close versus Twenty, API documentation used for Close versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Close versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Close versus Twenty. These Close sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Day.ai vs Twenty

  Choose Day.ai when

  Choose Day.ai over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0/mo (Free); 1h setup assessment; Day.ai's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Day.ai's 1h setup assessment, $0/mo (Free), and Day.ai's checked sources link MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Day.ai versus Twenty on published starting price: Day.ai - $0/mo (Free); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, Day.ai has a 1h setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Day.ai's checked sources link MCP documentation; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Day.ai versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Day.ai versus Twenty, Documentation used for Day.ai versus Twenty, Pricing used for Day.ai versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for Day.ai versus Twenty. These Day.ai sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

• 

  folk vs Twenty

  Choose folk when

  Choose folk over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $30/member/mo (Standard, monthly billing); 30m setup assessment; folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than folk's 30m setup assessment, $30/member/mo (Standard, monthly billing), and folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  folk versus Twenty on published starting price: folk - $30/member/mo (Standard, monthly billing); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, folk has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, folk's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For folk versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for folk versus Twenty, Documentation used for folk versus Twenty, Pricing used for folk versus Twenty, API documentation used for folk versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for folk versus Twenty. These folk sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

• 

  HubSpot CRM vs Twenty

  Choose HubSpot CRM when

  Choose HubSpot CRM over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free CRM, up to 2 users); 30m setup assessment; HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than HubSpot CRM's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free CRM, up to 2 users), and HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  HubSpot CRM versus Twenty on published starting price: HubSpot CRM - $0 (Free CRM, up to 2 users); Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, HubSpot CRM has a 30m setup assessment; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, HubSpot CRM's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, Documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, Pricing used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, API documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty, MCP documentation used for HubSpot CRM versus Twenty. These HubSpot CRM sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Pipedrive vs Twenty

  Choose Pipedrive when

  Choose Pipedrive over Twenty when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: No published starting price in the reviewed sources; No setup assessment recorded; Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Twenty constraints are $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing); 30m setup assessment; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Twenty in contention when

  Keep Twenty when 30m setup assessment, $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing), and Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Pipedrive's No setup assessment recorded, No published starting price in the reviewed sources, and Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Pipedrive versus Twenty on published starting price: Pipedrive - No published starting price in the reviewed sources; Twenty - $9/user/mo (Pro, yearly billing). On setup, Pipedrive has a No setup assessment recorded; Twenty has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Pipedrive's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification; Twenty's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Pipedrive versus Twenty, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, Documentation used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, API documentation used for Pipedrive versus Twenty, OpenAPI specification used for Pipedrive versus Twenty. These Pipedrive sources inform comparison with Twenty, not every sentence individually.