5 alternatives to Make.com
Reviewed by Cheetah Systems Lab research team on 2026-08-03. Competitive set: Workflow and agent orchestration. The reviewer profile includes the editorial and corrections policy.
Compare Make.com on price and setup. Check Make.com against 5 rivals on developer access, buyer fit and tradeoffs.
Why teams replace Make.com
Pricing is metered in "operations" consumed per module execution, not a flat per-workflow rate, so scenarios with many steps or high-frequency triggers can consume the monthly credit allotment quickly regardless of how simple the underlying task is. The Free plan caps scenarios at a 15-minute minimum run interval and 2 active scenarios, which rules out near-real-time or high-scenario-count use without upgrading. Custom variables and full-text execution log search - useful for debugging complex automations - are gated behind the Pro tier and above, so teams doing serious troubleshooting on the entry-level Core plan will hit friction.
Make.com current baseline
Make is a visual automation platform (the successor brand to Integromat) built around scenarios - flowcharts of connected app modules with routers, filters, and data stores.
- Visual, node-and-router scenario builder connecting 3,000+ pre-built app integrations
- AI Agents: deploy and manage agent-driven automations inside scenarios
- Make MCP Server: exposes existing Make scenarios as callable tools for AI clients like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor
- Make Grid for a unified, organization-wide view of automation landscape
- REST API and Make CLI for programmatic scenario/resource management
- Published starting point
- $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.
- Setup
- 30m setup assessment
- Developer access
- API documentation, MCP documentation
How each alternative compares with Make.com
Gumloop vs Make.com
Choose Gumloop when
Choose Gumloop over Make.com when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $37/mo (Pro); 30m setup assessment; Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Make.com constraints are $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Make.com in contention when
Keep Make.com when 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Gumloop's 30m setup assessment, $37/mo (Pro), and Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Gumloop versus Make.com on published starting price: Gumloop - $37/mo (Pro); Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.. On setup, Gumloop has a 30m setup assessment; Make.com has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
For Gumloop versus Make.com, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Gumloop versus Make.com, Documentation used for Gumloop versus Make.com, Pricing used for Gumloop versus Make.com, API documentation used for Gumloop versus Make.com, MCP documentation used for Gumloop versus Make.com. These Gumloop sources inform comparison with Make.com, not every sentence individually.
Lindy vs Make.com
Choose Lindy when
Choose Lindy over Make.com when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link. The corresponding Make.com constraints are $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Make.com in contention when
Keep Make.com when 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Lindy's 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Lindy versus Make.com on published starting price: Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team); Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.. On setup, Lindy has a 5m setup assessment; Make.com has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
For Lindy versus Make.com, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Lindy versus Make.com, Documentation used for Lindy versus Make.com, Pricing used for Lindy versus Make.com. These Lindy sources inform comparison with Make.com, not every sentence individually.
n8n vs Make.com
Choose n8n when
Choose n8n over Make.com when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: €20/month (Starter, billed annually); 1h setup assessment; n8n's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link. The corresponding Make.com constraints are $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Make.com in contention when
Keep Make.com when 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than n8n's 1h setup assessment, €20/month (Starter, billed annually), and n8n's checked sources did not link a developer interface.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
n8n versus Make.com on published starting price: n8n - €20/month (Starter, billed annually); Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.. On setup, n8n has a 1h setup assessment; Make.com has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, n8n's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
For n8n versus Make.com, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for n8n versus Make.com, Documentation used for n8n versus Make.com, Pricing used for n8n versus Make.com. These n8n sources inform comparison with Make.com, not every sentence individually.
Relevance AI vs Make.com
Choose Relevance AI when
Choose Relevance AI over Make.com when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired; 30m setup assessment; Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Make.com constraints are $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Make.com in contention when
Keep Make.com when 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Relevance AI's 30m setup assessment, $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired, and Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Relevance AI versus Make.com on published starting price: Relevance AI - $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired; Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.. On setup, Relevance AI has a 30m setup assessment; Make.com has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
For Relevance AI versus Make.com, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Relevance AI versus Make.com, Documentation used for Relevance AI versus Make.com, Pricing used for Relevance AI versus Make.com, MCP documentation used for Relevance AI versus Make.com. These Relevance AI sources inform comparison with Make.com, not every sentence individually.
Zapier vs Make.com
Choose Zapier when
Choose Zapier over Make.com when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo); 5m setup assessment; Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Make.com constraints are $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Make.com in contention when
Keep Make.com when 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation are the more workable constraints for the team than Zapier's 5m setup assessment, $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo), and Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Zapier versus Make.com on published starting price: Zapier - $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo); Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.. On setup, Zapier has a 5m setup assessment; Make.com has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
For Zapier versus Make.com, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Zapier versus Make.com, Documentation used for Zapier versus Make.com, Pricing used for Zapier versus Make.com, MCP documentation used for Zapier versus Make.com. These Zapier sources inform comparison with Make.com, not every sentence individually.
Make.com baseline sources
- Make.com Official website
- Make.com Official documentation
- Make.com Official API documentation
- Make.com Official MCP documentation
- Make.com Official pricing page
- Make.com Make.com pricing fields source
Verify before deciding
- Make.com pricing fields checked 2026-10-15. Scope: pricing fields only.
- A downloadable OpenAPI/Swagger JSON specification for the Make REST API
- API rate limits
- A specific official product-demo video URL with confirmed vendor channel authorship
- Named MCP tool list exposed by Make MCP Server
- Time-boxed trial terms for paid plans beyond the perpetual Free tier
Cheetah assessed Make.com buyer fit, setup and tradeoffs. Shortlist reviewed 2026-07-31.