5 alternatives to Lindy

Reviewed by Cheetah Systems Lab research team on 2026-08-03. Competitive set: Workflow and agent orchestration. The reviewer profile includes the editorial and corrections policy.

Compare Lindy on price and setup. Check Lindy against 5 rivals on developer access, buyer fit and tradeoffs.

Read the Lindy profile

Why teams replace Lindy

Usage is metered by an unpublished internal credit system tied to inbox count and plan tier (Plus: 2 inboxes; Pro: 3 inboxes and 3x usage; Max: 5 inboxes and 7x usage), so teams cannot easily estimate cost from task volume alone before signing up. HIPAA compliance with a signed BAA is Enterprise-only, so healthcare teams handling PHI on the Plus/Pro/Max tiers are not covered.

Lindy current baseline

Lindy is a no-code AI agent builder marketed primarily as a personal/executive-assistant product: agents are configured with a trigger (an inbound email, a phone call, a webhook, a schedule) and a chain of downstream skill actions (summarize, classify, draft, call an API, write to a CRM).

Email inbox triage, sorting, labeling, and AI-drafted replies in the user's voice
Meeting scheduling, pre-meeting briefings/attendee research, meeting notes, and follow-up summaries
Multi-channel task delegation via iMessage, SMS, Slack, email, or the web app
No-code Agent Builder with triggers (inbound email, phone call, webhook) and downstream skill actions
Built-in skills: Computer Use, Lindy Embed, Lindy Mail, Lindy Phone, Run Code, Timer, Web Browser

Published starting point: $49.99/active user/mo (Team)
Setup: 5m setup assessment
Developer access: No developer-interface link in the checked sources

How each alternative compares with Lindy

Gumloop vs Lindy
Choose Gumloop when
Choose Gumloop over Lindy when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $37/mo (Pro); 30m setup assessment; Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Lindy constraints are $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Lindy in contention when
Keep Lindy when 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface are the more workable constraints for the team than Gumloop's 30m setup assessment, $37/mo (Pro), and Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Gumloop versus Lindy on published starting price: Gumloop - $37/mo (Pro); Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team). On setup, Gumloop has a 30m setup assessment; Lindy has a 5m setup assessment. On developer access, Gumloop's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah assessment
For Gumloop versus Lindy, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Gumloop versus Lindy, Documentation used for Gumloop versus Lindy, Pricing used for Gumloop versus Lindy, API documentation used for Gumloop versus Lindy, MCP documentation used for Gumloop versus Lindy. These Gumloop sources inform comparison with Lindy, not every sentence individually.
Make.com vs Lindy
Choose Make.com when
Choose Make.com over Lindy when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; 30m setup assessment; Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Lindy constraints are $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Lindy in contention when
Keep Lindy when 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface are the more workable constraints for the team than Make.com's 30m setup assessment, $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month., and Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Make.com versus Lindy on published starting price: Make.com - $0/month Free plan with 1,000 credits/month.; Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team). On setup, Make.com has a 30m setup assessment; Lindy has a 5m setup assessment. On developer access, Make.com's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah assessment
For Make.com versus Lindy, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Make.com versus Lindy, Documentation used for Make.com versus Lindy, Pricing used for Make.com versus Lindy, API documentation used for Make.com versus Lindy, MCP documentation used for Make.com versus Lindy, Make.com pricing fields source used for Make.com versus Lindy. These Make.com sources inform comparison with Lindy, not every sentence individually.
n8n vs Lindy
Choose n8n when
Choose n8n over Lindy when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: €20/month (Starter, billed annually); 1h setup assessment; n8n's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link. The corresponding Lindy constraints are $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Lindy in contention when
Keep Lindy when 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface are the more workable constraints for the team than n8n's 1h setup assessment, €20/month (Starter, billed annually), and n8n's checked sources did not link a developer interface.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
n8n versus Lindy on published starting price: n8n - €20/month (Starter, billed annually); Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team). On setup, n8n has a 1h setup assessment; Lindy has a 5m setup assessment. On developer access, n8n's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah assessment
For n8n versus Lindy, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for n8n versus Lindy, Documentation used for n8n versus Lindy, Pricing used for n8n versus Lindy. These n8n sources inform comparison with Lindy, not every sentence individually.
Relevance AI vs Lindy
Choose Relevance AI when
Choose Relevance AI over Lindy when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired; 30m setup assessment; Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Lindy constraints are $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Lindy in contention when
Keep Lindy when 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface are the more workable constraints for the team than Relevance AI's 30m setup assessment, $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired, and Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Relevance AI versus Lindy on published starting price: Relevance AI - $19/month billed annually or $29/month billed monthly (Pro); 30,000 Actions/year or 2,500/month; Free is retired; Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team). On setup, Relevance AI has a 30m setup assessment; Lindy has a 5m setup assessment. On developer access, Relevance AI's checked sources link MCP documentation; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah assessment
For Relevance AI versus Lindy, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Relevance AI versus Lindy, Documentation used for Relevance AI versus Lindy, Pricing used for Relevance AI versus Lindy, MCP documentation used for Relevance AI versus Lindy. These Relevance AI sources inform comparison with Lindy, not every sentence individually.
Zapier vs Lindy
Choose Zapier when
Choose Zapier over Lindy when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo); 5m setup assessment; Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Lindy constraints are $49.99/active user/mo (Team); 5m setup assessment; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah comparison of published constraints
Keep Lindy in contention when
Keep Lindy when 5m setup assessment, $49.99/active user/mo (Team), and Lindy's checked sources did not link a developer interface are the more workable constraints for the team than Zapier's 5m setup assessment, $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo), and Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation.
Cheetah assessment
Key tradeoff
Zapier versus Lindy on published starting price: Zapier - $0/mo (Free, 100 tasks/mo); Lindy - $49.99/active user/mo (Team). On setup, Zapier has a 5m setup assessment; Lindy has a 5m setup assessment. On developer access, Zapier's checked sources link MCP documentation; Lindy's checked sources did not include a developer-interface link.
Cheetah assessment
For Zapier versus Lindy, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Zapier versus Lindy, Documentation used for Zapier versus Lindy, Pricing used for Zapier versus Lindy, MCP documentation used for Zapier versus Lindy. These Zapier sources inform comparison with Lindy, not every sentence individually.