9 alternatives to Apollo

How each alternative compares with Apollo

• 

  Cognism vs Apollo

  Choose Cognism when

  Choose Cognism over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: Published pricing retained; no single starting figure recorded; custom setup assessment; Cognism's checked sources link API documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Cognism's custom setup assessment, Published pricing retained; no single starting figure recorded, and Cognism's checked sources link API documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Cognism versus Apollo on published starting price: Cognism - Published pricing retained; no single starting figure recorded; Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Cognism has a custom setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Cognism's checked sources link API documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Cognism versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-31: Website used for Cognism versus Apollo, Pricing used for Cognism versus Apollo, API documentation used for Cognism versus Apollo. These Cognism sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Dropcontact vs Apollo

  Choose Dropcontact when

  Choose Dropcontact over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: €79/month (Starter, monthly billing); 30m setup assessment; Dropcontact's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Dropcontact's 30m setup assessment, €79/month (Starter, monthly billing), and Dropcontact's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Dropcontact versus Apollo on published starting price: Dropcontact - €79/month (Starter, monthly billing); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Dropcontact has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Dropcontact's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Dropcontact versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for Dropcontact versus Apollo, Pricing used for Dropcontact versus Apollo, API documentation used for Dropcontact versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for Dropcontact versus Apollo. These Dropcontact sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Explorium vs Apollo

  Choose Explorium when

  Choose Explorium over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $99.99 for 2,500 credits (Starter); 30m setup assessment; Explorium's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Explorium's 30m setup assessment, $99.99 for 2,500 credits (Starter), and Explorium's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Explorium versus Apollo on published starting price: Explorium - $99.99 for 2,500 credits (Starter); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Explorium has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Explorium's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Explorium versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-30: Website used for Explorium versus Apollo, Documentation used for Explorium versus Apollo, Pricing used for Explorium versus Apollo, API documentation used for Explorium versus Apollo, OpenAPI specification used for Explorium versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for Explorium versus Apollo. These Explorium sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Findymail vs Apollo

  Choose Findymail when

  Choose Findymail over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $99/month (Starter); 30m setup assessment; Findymail's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Findymail's 30m setup assessment, $99/month (Starter), and Findymail's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Findymail versus Apollo on published starting price: Findymail - $99/month (Starter); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Findymail has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Findymail's checked sources link API documentation, OpenAPI specification; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Findymail versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-31: Website used for Findymail versus Apollo, Documentation used for Findymail versus Apollo, Pricing used for Findymail versus Apollo, API documentation used for Findymail versus Apollo, OpenAPI specification used for Findymail versus Apollo. These Findymail sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  FullEnrich vs Apollo

  Choose FullEnrich when

  Choose FullEnrich over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free, 50 credits, no card required); 30m setup assessment; FullEnrich's checked sources link MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than FullEnrich's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free, 50 credits, no card required), and FullEnrich's checked sources link MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  FullEnrich versus Apollo on published starting price: FullEnrich - $0 (Free, 50 credits, no card required); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, FullEnrich has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, FullEnrich's checked sources link MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For FullEnrich versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-08-03: Website used for FullEnrich versus Apollo, Documentation used for FullEnrich versus Apollo, Pricing used for FullEnrich versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for FullEnrich versus Apollo. These FullEnrich sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Hunter vs Apollo

  Choose Hunter when

  Choose Hunter over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free, 50 credits/month); 30m setup assessment; Hunter's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Hunter's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free, 50 credits/month), and Hunter's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Hunter versus Apollo on published starting price: Hunter - $0 (Free, 50 credits/month); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Hunter has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Hunter's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Hunter versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-31: Website used for Hunter versus Apollo, Documentation used for Hunter versus Apollo, Pricing used for Hunter versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for Hunter versus Apollo. These Hunter sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  LeadMagic vs Apollo

  Choose LeadMagic when

  Choose LeadMagic over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $49.99/month (Basic plan, billed monthly); no free tier; 30m setup assessment; LeadMagic's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than LeadMagic's 30m setup assessment, $49.99/month (Basic plan, billed monthly); no free tier, and LeadMagic's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  LeadMagic versus Apollo on published starting price: LeadMagic - $49.99/month (Basic plan, billed monthly); no free tier; Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, LeadMagic has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, LeadMagic's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For LeadMagic versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-30: Website used for LeadMagic versus Apollo, Documentation used for LeadMagic versus Apollo, Pricing used for LeadMagic versus Apollo, API documentation used for LeadMagic versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for LeadMagic versus Apollo. These LeadMagic sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Prospeo vs Apollo

  Choose Prospeo when

  Choose Prospeo over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free, 100 credits/month); paid from $49/month per user (Starter, monthly billing) or $37/month per user billed yearly; 30m setup assessment; Prospeo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Prospeo's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free, 100 credits/month); paid from $49/month per user (Starter, monthly billing) or $37/month per user billed yearly, and Prospeo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Prospeo versus Apollo on published starting price: Prospeo - $0 (Free, 100 credits/month); paid from $49/month per user (Starter, monthly billing) or $37/month per user billed yearly; Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Prospeo has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Prospeo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Prospeo versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-08-21: Website used for Prospeo versus Apollo, Documentation used for Prospeo versus Apollo, Pricing used for Prospeo versus Apollo, API documentation used for Prospeo versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for Prospeo versus Apollo. These Prospeo sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.

• 

  Surfe vs Apollo

  Choose Surfe when

  Choose Surfe over Apollo when these published constraints align more closely with the requirement: $0 (Free); 30m setup assessment; Surfe's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation. The corresponding Apollo constraints are $49/mo; 30m setup assessment; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah comparison of published constraints

  Keep Apollo in contention when

  Keep Apollo when 30m setup assessment, $49/mo, and Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification are the more workable constraints for the team than Surfe's 30m setup assessment, $0 (Free), and Surfe's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation.

  Cheetah assessment

  Key tradeoff

  Surfe versus Apollo on published starting price: Surfe - $0 (Free); Apollo - $49/mo. On setup, Surfe has a 30m setup assessment; Apollo has a 30m setup assessment. On developer access, Surfe's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation; Apollo's checked sources link API documentation, MCP documentation, OpenAPI specification.

  Cheetah assessment

  For Surfe versus Apollo, official pages checked 2026-07-31: Website used for Surfe versus Apollo, Documentation used for Surfe versus Apollo, Pricing used for Surfe versus Apollo, MCP documentation used for Surfe versus Apollo. These Surfe sources inform comparison with Apollo, not every sentence individually.