Agent skill
abm-orchestrator
Filed under ABM and paid.
From VijayMatt/go-to-market-agent-skills · 12 skills · 1 · pushed 2026-03-29
What it does when it runs
Read from the skill and the 3 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- None found.
- Hosts it reaches
- No third-party host appears in the skill or its bundled files.
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound. - Actions present in the files
- None. Instructions only.
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/VijayMatt/go-to-market-agent-skills.git /tmp/go-to-market-agent-skills git -C /tmp/go-to-market-agent-skills sparse-checkout set "abm-orchestrator" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/abm-orchestrator cp -R "/tmp/go-to-market-agent-skills/abm-orchestrator/." ~/.claude/skills/abm-orchestrator/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from VijayMatt/go-to-market-agent-skills/blob/c948db28e7a0147976cc91ad91479900a75f7904/abm-orchestrator/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (repository). 3,094 words, 37 headings.
ABM Orchestrator: Full Methodology
What ABM Actually Is (vs. What Most Teams Do)
Account-Based Marketing is the coordinated use of multiple channels to engage a specific set of target accounts with personalized messaging, aligned between marketing and sales toward a revenue outcome.
What ABM is NOT:
- Sending the same email to a smaller list (that's just bad email marketing)
- Running LinkedIn ads targeting a company name (that's one channel, not a program)
- Marketing doing stuff and then "handing off leads" to sales (that's lead gen with ABM branding)
- A technology platform you buy (6sense, Demandbase, etc. are tools; ABM is a strategy)
The core principle: In demand gen, you attract leads and hope some are from good accounts. In ABM, you choose the accounts first and then create demand within them. This inversion changes everything about how you build campaigns, measure success, and coordinate with sales.
The ABM Tier Framework
Not every target account deserves the same level of investment. The tier framework ensures you allocate resources proportionally to potential revenue.
Tier 1: Strategic (1:1)
What it is: Fully customized campaigns for individual accounts. Every piece of content, every touchpoint, every message is tailored to one specific company.
Investment: High (10-20 hours/month per account in marketing effort) Number of accounts: 5-25 Best for: Enterprise deals with $200K+ ACV, multi-year potential, high strategic value Typical channels: Custom content, executive dinners, personalized direct mail, 1:1 ads, tailored events, custom microsites
Tier 2: Cluster (1:Few)
What it is: Personalized campaigns for small groups of accounts that share common characteristics (same industry, same size, same challenge, same tech stack).
Investment: Medium (2-5 hours/month per cluster) Number of accounts: 25-200 (in clusters of 5-20) Best for: Mid-market deals with $50K-$200K ACV Typical channels: Industry-specific content, vertical webinars, targeted ads by account list, personalized email sequences
Tier 3: Programmatic (1:Many)
What it is: Scalable, technology-driven campaigns targeting hundreds of accounts with light personalization (industry, persona, pain point — but not account-specific).
Investment: Low (automated with periodic optimization) Number of accounts: 200-2,000+ Best for: SMB or lower mid-market with $10K-$50K ACV, or as an awareness layer for accounts not yet in Tier 1/2 Typical channels: Programmatic ads, automated email sequences, retargeting, content syndication
See references/tier-selection.md for the decision framework for choosing which tier each account belongs to.
Account Selection: Choosing Your Targets
The 3-Layer Selection Model
Every account should be scored across three layers. The composite score determines whether it's a target and which tier it belongs to.
Layer 1: ICP Fit (Is this a good account for us?) Score based on firmographic and technographic match to your ideal customer profile.
| Factor | High Fit | Medium Fit | Low Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company size | Sweet spot (e.g., 200-2,000 employees) | Adjacent (100-200 or 2,000-5,000) | Outside range |
| Industry | Primary target vertical | Adjacent vertical | Non-target vertical |
| Tech stack | Uses complementary tech; no blocker | Neutral tech environment | Uses competing/incompatible tech |
| Geography | Primary market | Expanding into their market | Not served |
| Budget indicators | Revenue/funding supports your price point | Borderline | Clearly under-resourced |
Layer 2: Intent Signals (Are they in-market now?) Score based on behavioral signals indicating active interest.
| Signal | High Intent | Medium Intent | Low Intent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website visits | Multiple visits from multiple people at the account | Some visits, single person | No visits |
| Content engagement | Downloaded gated content, attended webinar | Opened emails, clicked links | No engagement |
| Third-party intent | Researching your category on G2, TrustRadius, etc. | Researching adjacent categories | No signals |
| Search behavior | Searching for your category keywords | Searching for problem-related keywords | No relevant search activity |
| Job postings | Hiring for roles that use your product | Hiring generally in your space | No relevant postings |
Layer 3: Relationship (Do we have a way in?) Score based on existing connections and engagement history.
| Factor | Strong | Medium | Weak |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existing contacts | Know the decision-maker personally | Have contacts but not at decision-maker level | No contacts |
| Prior engagement | Former customer or active evaluator | Attended an event, downloaded content | Never interacted |
| Mutual connections | Team members have LinkedIn connections to key people | Some shared connections | No connections |
| Partner overlap | Shared partner/GSI relationship | Partner aware of the account | No partner involvement |
Composite Scoring:
| ICP Fit | Intent | Relationship | Recommended Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | High | Any | Tier 1 |
| High | Medium | Strong | Tier 1 |
| High | Medium | Medium/Weak | Tier 2 |
| High | Low | Any | Tier 3 (warm them up) |
| Medium | High | Any | Tier 2 |
| Medium | Medium | Any | Tier 3 |
| Low | Any | Any | Do not target |
Buying Committee Mapping
Every B2B purchase involves multiple people. ABM requires understanding each person and tailoring your approach to their specific concerns.
See references/buying-committee-map.md for the fillable template. Here's the framework:
The 6 Buying Committee Roles
| Role | What They Care About | Your Messaging Focus | Content They Consume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Buyer (CFO, VP) | ROI, risk, strategic alignment, budget impact | Business outcomes, total cost of ownership, competitive advantage | Executive briefs, ROI calculators, peer case studies |
| Technical Buyer (CTO, IT Director) | Integration, security, architecture, maintenance burden | Technical specs, API docs, security certifications, architecture diagrams | Technical white papers, integration guides, security documentation |
| User Buyer (Manager, Team Lead) | Day-to-day usability, workflow improvement, team adoption | Ease of use, time savings, workflow automation, training support | Product demos, UI walkthroughs, user testimonials |
| Champion (Internal advocate) | Looking good internally, solving a problem they own | Everything above, plus internal pitch materials | Business cases, internal presentation decks, competitive comparisons |
| Influencer (Analyst, Consultant, Peer) | Credibility, thought leadership, industry trends | Thought leadership, research, vendor-neutral insights | Industry reports, research papers, conference talks |
| Blocker (Legal, Security, Procurement) | Compliance, risk, terms, vendor qualification | Compliance certifications, standard terms, reference customers | Security questionnaires, compliance documentation, procurement guides |
Mapping the Committee for Each Account
For Tier 1 accounts, map every buying committee member by name:
Account: [Company Name]
Primary Pain: [What problem are we solving?]
Economic Buyer:
Name: [Name]
Title: [Title]
Known Priorities: [What do they care about this quarter?]
Engagement Status: [Aware / Engaged / Supportive / Unknown]
Messaging Hook: [Specific angle for this person]
Technical Buyer:
Name: [Name]
...
User Buyer:
Name: [Name]
...
Potential Champion:
Name: [Name]
Why They'd Champion: [Personal win if this succeeds]
...
Known Blockers:
Name: [Name]
Concern: [Specific concern to address]
...
For Tier 2 accounts, map by persona (not individual name). For Tier 3, map by role only.
Channel Orchestration
ABM is not one channel. It's the coordinated use of multiple channels, timed and sequenced so the account experiences a coherent narrative, not random noise.
The Channel Mix by Tier
| Channel | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn Ads | Account-specific creative | Cluster-specific creative | Persona-based creative |
| Email Sequences | Highly personalized, 1:1 | Persona-personalized, account-referenced | Template-based with dynamic fields |
| Direct Mail | Premium, personalized gifts/mailers | Themed mailers for the cluster | N/A |
| Events | Private executive dinners, 1:1 briefings | Vertical-specific roundtables | Webinars, virtual events |
| Content | Custom microsites, personalized reports | Industry-specific content | Category-level content |
| Sales Outreach | Fully coordinated with marketing touches | Sequenced after marketing engagement | Triggered by engagement signals |
| Retargeting | Account-specific retargeting pixels | List-based retargeting | Broad category retargeting |
| Social | Direct engagement with key contacts' posts | Engagement with company page and key people | Brand awareness |
Orchestration Principles
-
Surround, don't spam. The goal is for the account to encounter your brand across multiple channels in a way that feels intentional and relevant, not repetitive. If they see the same message on LinkedIn, in email, and in a direct mail piece, that's repetition. If they see a thought-leadership piece on LinkedIn, a relevant case study in email, and a personalized book in the mail, that's surrounding.
-
Sequence, don't blast. Channels should be sequenced:
- Week 1-2: Awareness (ads, social engagement, thought leadership)
- Week 3-4: Education (email with relevant content, webinar invite)
- Week 5-6: Engagement (direct mail, sales outreach)
- Week 7-8: Activation (meeting request, demo offer, event invite)
-
Trigger, don't schedule. The best ABM programs use engagement signals to trigger next steps, not fixed calendars. If an account visits your pricing page on Day 3, don't wait until Day 14 to send the sales email.
-
Coordinate with sales DAILY. Marketing and sales must know what each other is doing with each account. The worst outcome is a sales rep calling the same day marketing sends a direct mail piece — and neither knows about the other. Use a shared account dashboard or daily standup.
Content Mapping
The Content Matrix: Persona x Stage
| Awareness Stage | Consideration Stage | Decision Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Buyer | Industry trend report | ROI analysis / peer case study | Proposal / executive summary |
| Technical Buyer | Technology landscape overview | Integration architecture guide | Technical POC plan / security documentation |
| User Buyer | "Day in the life" before/after content | Product walkthrough / demo video | Free trial / pilot plan |
| Champion | Problem framing content they can share internally | Internal business case template | Competitive comparison / objection-handling doc |
| Influencer | Original research / industry benchmark | Expert roundtable / panel content | Reference customers in their network |
Content Production by Tier
| Content Type | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blog posts | Existing, curated for account | Existing, curated for cluster | Existing, broadly relevant |
| Case studies | Custom with their industry/use case emphasis | Industry-matched | Category-level |
| Reports/Whitepapers | Custom analysis for their organization | Vertical-specific | Category-level |
| Microsites | Yes, account-specific | No | No |
| Video | Personalized (Vidyard/Loom) | Persona-specific | Webinar recordings |
| Email copy | Fully custom per contact | Templated with account-level personalization | Templated with persona-level personalization |
The 90-Day ABM Sprint
ABM campaigns should be planned in 90-day sprints. This gives enough time for the multi-touch approach to work while maintaining urgency and measurability. See references/campaign-timeline.md for the week-by-week template.
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-3)
- Finalize target account list and tier assignments
- Map buying committees for Tier 1 and Tier 2 accounts
- Align with sales on account ownership and outreach approach
- Build/curate content for each persona x stage combination
- Set up ad campaigns, email sequences, and tracking
- Establish baseline metrics for each account (current engagement level)
Phase 2: Awareness (Weeks 4-6)
- Launch LinkedIn/programmatic ads targeting all tiers
- Begin social engagement with Tier 1 contacts (commenting on their posts, sharing their content)
- Send first email touch (thought leadership, not product)
- Ship direct mail to Tier 1 contacts (if applicable)
- Track engagement and adjust messaging based on early signals
Phase 3: Engagement (Weeks 7-9)
- Send second email touch (case study or relevant content based on persona)
- Sales begins warm outreach to engaged accounts (those showing intent signals)
- Host or invite to a relevant event (webinar, roundtable, dinner)
- Retarget website visitors from target accounts
- Tier 1: personalized video messages to key contacts
- Review and adjust: which accounts are warming up? Which need a different approach?
Phase 4: Activation (Weeks 10-12)
- Sales outreach to all engaged accounts (meeting requests, demo offers)
- Tier 1: executive-level touchpoint (C-level email, board member introduction, executive briefing)
- Event follow-up for attendees
- Direct outreach to unengaged Tier 1 accounts (different approach — new angle, different contact)
- Measure results, compile learnings, plan next sprint
Measurement: ABM-Specific Metrics
ABM measurement is fundamentally different from demand gen measurement. You're not counting leads. You're measuring account-level engagement and pipeline impact.
Primary Metrics (Report These)
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Account Engagement Score | Composite score of all interactions across an account (ad views, email opens, website visits, meeting attendance, content downloads) | Increasing trend; 70%+ of Tier 1 accounts "engaged" |
| Pipeline Created (influenced) | Total pipeline $ from target accounts during the ABM campaign | 3-5x the campaign investment |
| Pipeline Velocity | Time from first touch to opportunity creation for ABM accounts vs. non-ABM | ABM accounts should move 20-30% faster |
| Average Deal Size | ACV of deals from ABM accounts vs. non-ABM | ABM accounts should be 30-50% larger |
| Win Rate | Close rate of ABM opportunities vs. non-ABM | ABM opportunities should close at 1.5-2x the rate |
| Coverage | % of target accounts with any engagement | 80%+ for Tier 1, 60%+ for Tier 2 |
Secondary Metrics (Track These)
| Metric | Definition |
|---|---|
| Contact coverage | How many buying committee members are you reaching per account? |
| Content engagement | Which content is resonating with which personas? |
| Channel effectiveness | Which channels drive the most engagement per tier? |
| Sales follow-up rate | % of marketing-engaged accounts that sales has contacted |
| Meeting conversion | % of engaged accounts that convert to meetings |
Attribution in ABM
ABM attribution is inherently multi-touch and multi-channel. Do NOT try to attribute pipeline to a single touchpoint. Instead:
- Influenced pipeline: Any pipeline from an account that received ABM touches (most common and most useful metric)
- Sourced pipeline: Pipeline where the first engagement was an ABM touch (useful but undercounts the impact of ABM on deals that started through other channels)
- Account engagement correlation: Compare pipeline outcomes of highly engaged accounts vs. low-engagement accounts (proves that ABM engagement correlates with pipeline)
Sales-Marketing Coordination
ABM fails without tight coordination between marketing and sales. This is not about "alignment" in the abstract — it's about specific, operational coordination.
The Operating Model
Shared:
- Target account list (jointly agreed)
- Account tier assignments (jointly agreed)
- Buying committee maps (marketing builds, sales validates)
- Engagement dashboards (both teams see the same data)
- Win/loss feedback (both teams contribute)
Marketing owns:
- Ad campaigns and creative
- Content creation and distribution
- Event planning and logistics
- Direct mail and gifting
- Engagement scoring and signal detection
Sales owns:
- 1:1 outreach and relationship building
- Meeting execution and deal progression
- Champion development
- Feedback on what's working and what isn't
- CRM data hygiene for target accounts
Coordination Cadence
| Cadence | Meeting | Attendees | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | Async (Slack channel) | Marketing + SDR/BDR | Share engagement signals, coordinate outreach timing |
| Weekly | 30-min standup | Marketing lead + Sales lead + SDR lead | Review account engagement, discuss warm accounts, adjust tactics |
| Bi-weekly | Account review | Full ABM team | Deep dive on Tier 1 accounts: what's working, what's not, next plays |
| Monthly | Strategy review | Marketing VP + Sales VP | Pipeline impact, budget vs. results, strategic adjustments |
| Quarterly | Sprint retrospective | Full ABM team | What worked, what didn't, plan next sprint |
The Handoff Problem (and How to Solve It)
The biggest ABM failure mode is the "handoff gap" — marketing creates engagement, but sales doesn't follow up (or follows up too late, or with a generic pitch that ignores all the personalization marketing invested in).
Solutions:
- Shared Slack channel per Tier 1 account. When marketing sends a direct mail piece, it's posted in the channel. When sales makes a call, it's logged in the channel. Both teams have real-time visibility.
- Engagement alerts. When an account hits an engagement threshold (e.g., 3+ people from the account visit your website in a week), sales gets an immediate alert with context: who visited, what they looked at, and a suggested talk track.
- Co-created outreach. For Tier 1, marketing and sales co-create the outreach messages. Marketing provides the research and messaging; sales provides the relationship context and personal touch.
- Shared accountability. Both teams are measured on pipeline from ABM accounts, not just their individual activities.
Common ABM Anti-Patterns
"ABM is just targeted demand gen"
Running the same demand gen playbook (white paper + nurture sequence) against a smaller list is not ABM. ABM requires account-level personalization, multi-stakeholder engagement, and sales-marketing coordination.
"We'll start with 500 accounts"
500 accounts at Tier 1 is impossible. 500 accounts at Tier 3 is just demand gen. Start with 10-15 Tier 1 accounts and 50-100 Tier 2 accounts. Learn, iterate, then scale.
"Marketing will source ABM leads and hand them to sales"
ABM is not a lead gen channel. It's a coordinated motion where marketing and sales work the same accounts simultaneously. If sales is waiting for "leads" from ABM, your operating model is wrong.
"We need ABM technology before we can start"
You can run effective Tier 1 ABM with LinkedIn, email, a direct mail provider, and a shared spreadsheet. Technology accelerates ABM; it doesn't enable it. Don't buy a $100K platform before you've proven the motion manually.
"Let's measure ABM by MQLs"
MQLs are a demand gen metric. ABM metrics are account-level: account engagement score, pipeline influenced, deal velocity, and coverage. If you're counting MQLs from your ABM program, you're measuring the wrong thing.
Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
references/tier-selection.md | Decision framework for choosing ABM tier per account |
references/buying-committee-map.md | Template for mapping the buying committee |
references/campaign-timeline.md | 90-day ABM sprint template with week-by-week activities |
Files bundled with it
These load only when the skill asks for them, so they cost nothing until it runs.
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- orchestrator by Salesably · 48
- sales-orchestrator by Salesably · 48
- abm-engagement-scoring by NEON-Rutger · 45
- abm-campaign-execution by ZENABM · 25
- abm-strategy-planning by ZENABM · 25
- linkedin-abm-audit by ZENABM · 25
- linkedin-abm-report by ZENABM · 25
- abm by octavehq · 11
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what abm-orchestrator does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.