Agent skill
lead-nurture
Lead nurture orchestration - multi-track nurture design by intent stage, scoring, behavioral triggers, MQL→SQL handoff, and revival of cold leads.
Filed under Outbound email.
From varunk130/ai-gtm-skill-library · 31 skills · 5 · pushed 2026-07-31
What it does when it runs
Lead nurture orchestration - multi-track nurture design by intent stage, scoring, behavioral triggers, MQL→SQL handoff, and revival of cold leads. Use when: lead nurture, drip campaign, nurture track, lead scoring, MQL to SQL, lifecycle marketing, nurture sequence, behavioral trigger, lead revival, MQL handoff.
Read from the skill and the 0 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- None found.
- Hosts it reaches
- No third-party host appears in the skill or its bundled files.
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound. - Actions present in the files
- None. Instructions only.
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/varunk130/ai-gtm-skill-library.git /tmp/ai-gtm-skill-library git -C /tmp/ai-gtm-skill-library sparse-checkout set "revops-skills/lead-nurture" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/lead-nurture cp -R "/tmp/ai-gtm-skill-library/revops-skills/lead-nurture/." ~/.claude/skills/lead-nurture/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from varunk130/ai-gtm-skill-library/blob/90e878c73a8fbfd1cab864424ccf674fdc889157/revops-skills/lead-nurture/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (repository). 841 words, 11 headings.
Lead Nurture (NURTURE Framework)
Design a lead-nurture system that respects buyer intent, routes leads to the right next action, and stops sending eight more emails to people who already raised their hand. NURTURE replaces single-track drip sequences with multi-track journeys gated by behavioral signals.
Core Principle
Nurture fails when it treats time as the trigger. "Send email 3 on day 7" assumes every lead is on the same journey. NURTURE treats signal - not the calendar - as the trigger, and gates progression by demonstrated intent.
The NURTURE Framework
| Letter | Stage | The Question |
|---|---|---|
| N | Needs Mapping | What buying-stage needs does the lead currently have evidence of? |
| U | Understand Intent | What behavioral and explicit signals map to which stage? |
| R | Route to Track | Which nurture track does the lead enter, and on what entry criteria? |
| T | Trigger Progression | What signal moves the lead to the next step (or back)? |
| U | Upgrade to Sales | What threshold defines MQL → SQL handoff, and what's the SLA? |
| R | Recycle Cold | When does the lead exit the active track into long-cycle nurture? |
| E | Engagement Refresh | How is content kept current and personalization kept honest? |
Buying-Stage Nurture Tracks
| Stage | Lead State | Track Goal | Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unaware | Discovered category, no problem framing | Frame the problem | Bi-weekly |
| Aware | Acknowledges problem, exploring | Reframe with our POV | Weekly |
| Considering | Evaluating vendors | Differentiate + de-risk | 2-4×/week, behavior-gated |
| Decision | Short-listed | Accelerate to demo / sales | Daily during active window |
| Dormant / Lost | No activity 60+ days OR closed-lost | Reactivate on signal | Quarterly check-in + signal trigger |
Intent Signals
A robust nurture system reads explicit and behavioral signals together:
| Type | Example | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Explicit | Form fill, demo request, pricing page submit | High-confidence stage signal |
| Behavioral - high | Pricing page, comparison page, case study deep read | Considering or Decision |
| Behavioral - medium | Webinar registration, ebook download | Aware → Considering |
| Behavioral - low | Blog visit, newsletter open | Unaware → Aware |
| Decay | No engagement 30+ days | Re-route to lighter cadence |
Lead Scoring Design
Combine fit (firmographic) and intent (behavioral) into a 2D grid, not a single score:
| Fit \ Intent | Low | Medium | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Marketing nurture | Sales-assist | SQL - immediate |
| Medium | Standard nurture | Behavior-gated | SDR-triggered |
| Low | Newsletter only | Selective nurture | Manual triage |
MQL → SQL Handoff
Failures here cost more pipeline than any other nurture problem. Codify:
| Element | Spec |
|---|---|
| MQL Definition | Fit + intent threshold, with named behavioral triggers |
| SQL Definition | Sales-acceptance criteria written by sales |
| Handoff SLA | First sales touch within X hours of MQL |
| Disposition Loop | Sales must reason-code rejected MQLs; feeds scoring tuning |
| Recycle Path | Rejected MQLs return to specific track, not a black hole |
Output
Save to outputs/lead-nurture-[program]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md
| Artifact | Description |
|---|---|
| Track Map | Named tracks with entry / exit criteria and goal |
| Signal Catalog | Explicit + behavioral signals with weights |
| Scoring Grid | Fit × intent matrix with routing rules |
| Content Plan | Asset list per stage, refresh cadence |
| Handoff Spec | MQL / SQL definitions, SLA, disposition loop |
| Recycle Plan | Cold-lead criteria and reactivation triggers |
| KPIs | MQL → SQL conversion, SQL → opportunity rate, time-to-handoff, disposition reasons |
Process
- Map the buying stages for your motion; never assume one-size-fits-all
- Catalog the signals and weight them by historical conversion lift
- Design tracks per stage with explicit entry / exit, not just send schedules
- Build the scoring grid with sales co-sign; align on MQL / SQL definitions
- Spec the handoff with SLA, disposition loop, and recycle path
- Stand up the engagement refresh cycle - quarterly content audit + signal recalibration
Tips
- Time-based drip is anti-nurture - gate progression by signal, not by day
- Score is 2D, not 1D - fit and intent must remain separable
- A rejected MQL with no reason code is a broken loop - enforce disposition
- Refresh content quarterly or the program self-decays
- Cold leads aren't dead - long-cycle nurture frequently produces 10-20% of pipeline
Pairs With
- demand-engine - Channel mix that originates the leads
- journey-architect - Stages the nurture tracks attach to
- enablement-forge - Produces the per-stage assets
- customer-success - Inherits the lead at first value handoff
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- no-lead-left-behind-lead-treatment-audit by zapier · 329
- lead-magnets by coreyhaines31 · 45,947
- lead-dossier by ericosiu · 3,449
- lead-magnet by OpenClaudia · 664
- daily-lead-steward by zapier · 329
- find-lead-account-owner by zapier · 329
- inbound-lead-audit-cx-map by zapier · 329
- lead-scoring by shawnpang · 308
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what lead-nurture does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.