Agent skill
competitor-post-engagers
Find leads by scraping engagers from a competitor's top LinkedIn posts.
Filed under LinkedIn and social and Positioning and messaging.
From edupegoretti/fluidz-skills · 116 skills · 0 · pushed 2026-03-11
What it does when it runs
Find leads by scraping engagers from a competitor's top LinkedIn posts. Given one or more company page URLs, scrapes recent posts, ranks by engagement, selects the top N, extracts all reactors and commenters, ICP-classifies, and exports CSV. Use when someone wants to "find leads engaging with competitor content" or "scrape people who interact with [company]'s LinkedIn posts".
Read from the skill and the 2 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- APIFY_API_TOKEN
- APOLLO_API_KEY
- Hosts it reaches
- api.apify.com
- www.linkedin.com
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It does act, so it runs under whatever permissions your session already grants. - Actions present in the files
- shellwrites files
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/edupegoretti/fluidz-skills.git /tmp/fluidz-skills git -C /tmp/fluidz-skills sparse-checkout set "skills/capabilities/competitor-post-engagers" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/competitor-post-engagers cp -R "/tmp/fluidz-skills/skills/capabilities/competitor-post-engagers/." ~/.claude/skills/competitor-post-engagers/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
Before you install: this skill will not complete its job on a bare agent. It needs APIFY_API_TOKEN, APOLLO_API_KEY, which you have to obtain separately.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from edupegoretti/fluidz-skills/blob/a2cf697e2e8ec2ea517d85496e2d5c7f5dc44cd3/skills/capabilities/competitor-post-engagers/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (repository). 951 words, 11 headings.
Competitor Post Engagers
Find ICP-fit leads by scraping engagers from a competitor's top-performing LinkedIn posts. Given one or more company page URLs, this skill finds their highest-engagement recent posts, extracts everyone who reacted or commented, and classifies by ICP fit.
Core principle: Scrape all posts in one call per company, then locally rank and select the top N. This minimizes Apify costs while maximizing lead quality.
Phase 0: Intake
Ask the user these questions:
Target Companies
- LinkedIn company page URL(s) to scrape (e.g.,
https://www.linkedin.com/company/11x-ai/) - Time window — how many days back to look (default: 30)
- Top N posts per company to extract engagers from (default: 1)
ICP Criteria
- ICP keywords — job title/role terms that indicate a good lead (e.g., "sales", "SDR", "revenue")
- Exclude keywords — roles to filter out (e.g., "software engineer", "designer")
- Geographic focus (optional, e.g., "United States")
Save config in the client's campaign folder:
clients/<client-name>/campaigns/competitor-post-engagers/config.json
Config JSON structure:
{
"name": "<run-name>",
"company_urls": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/<competitor>/"],
"days_back": 30,
"max_posts": 50,
"max_reactions": 500,
"max_comments": 200,
"top_n_posts": 1,
"icp_keywords": ["sales", "revenue", "growth", "SDR", "BDR", "outbound"],
"exclude_keywords": ["software engineer", "developer", "designer"],
"enrich_companies": true,
"competitor_company_names": ["<competitor-name>"],
"industry_keywords": ["freight", "logistics", "trucking", "transportation", "3pl", "supply chain", "carrier", "brokerage", "shipping", "warehousing"],
"output_dir": "output"
}
enrich_companies— Enable Apollo company enrichment (default: true). Set to false or use--skip-company-enrichto skip.competitor_company_names— Company names to exclude from enrichment (the competitor itself).industry_keywords— Industry terms that indicate ICP fit. Matched against Apollo's industry field.
The output_dir is relative to the script directory by default. Override it with an absolute path to write output to the client's folder instead (e.g., "output_dir": "clients/<client-name>/leads").
Phase 1: Run the Pipeline
python3 skills/competitor-post-engagers/scripts/competitor_post_engagers.py \
--config clients/<client-name>/campaigns/competitor-post-engagers/config.json \
[--test] [--yes] [--skip-company-enrich] [--top-n 3] [--max-runs 30]
Flags:
--config(required) — path to config JSON--test— small limits (20 posts, 50 profiles, 1 top post)--yes— skip cost confirmation prompts--skip-company-enrich— skip Apollo company enrichment step (saves credits)--top-n— override top_n_posts from config--max-runs— override Apify run limit
Pipeline Steps
Step 1: Scrape company posts + engagers — For each company URL, one Apify call using harvestapi/linkedin-company-posts with scrapeReactions: true, scrapeComments: true. Returns posts, reactions, and comments in a single dataset.
Step 2: Rank & select top posts — Filter posts by time window (days_back), rank by total engagement (reactions + comments), select top N per company. Then extract engagers (reactors + commenters) only from those selected posts. Deduplication by name. Score engagers by position:
+3Commenter (higher intent)+2Position matches ICP keywords-5Position matches exclude keywords
Step 3: Company enrichment (Apollo) — Extract unique company names from engagers, call apollo.enrich_organization(name=...) for each. Returns industry, employee count, description, and location. ~1 Apollo credit per unique company. Merge data back to all engagers from that company. Skip with --skip-company-enrich or "enrich_companies": false.
Step 4: ICP classify & export — Classify as Likely ICP / Possible ICP / Unknown / Tech Vendor. Uses both headline keyword matching AND company industry data (from Step 3) — if the engager's company industry matches industry_keywords, they're classified as "Likely ICP" regardless of role. Export CSV.
Cost Estimates
| Parameter | Test | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Posts scraped per company | 20 | 50 |
| Max reactions | 50 | 500 |
| Max comments | 50 | 200 |
| Est. Apify cost (1 company) | ~$0.10 | ~$0.50-1 |
| Est. Apollo credits (company enrich) | ~10-20 | ~30-80 unique companies |
| Est. Apollo cost | ~$0.05-0.10 | ~$0.15-0.40 |
Phase 2: Review & Refine
Present results:
- Post selection — which posts were chosen and why (engagement counts, preview)
- Per-company breakdown — how many leads from each competitor
- ICP breakdown — counts by tier
- Top 15 leads — name, role, company, engagement type
Common adjustments:
- Too many irrelevant leads — tighten
icp_keywordsor addexclude_keywords - Missing ICP leads — broaden
icp_keywords - Wrong posts selected — increase
top_n_postsor adjustdays_back - Too expensive — use
--testmode or lowermax_reactions/max_comments
Phase 3: Output
CSV exported to {output_dir}/{name}-engagers-{date}.csv:
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| Name | Full name |
| LinkedIn URL | Profile link |
| Role | Parsed from headline |
| Company | Parsed from headline |
| Company Industry | From Apollo enrichment |
| Company Size | Estimated employee count from Apollo |
| Company Description | Short company description from Apollo |
| Company Location | City, State, Country from Apollo |
| Source Page | Which competitor's page |
| Post URL | Link to the specific post |
| Post Preview | First 120 chars of post content |
| Engagement Type | Comment or Reaction |
| Comment Text | Their comment (personalization gold) |
| ICP Tier | Likely ICP / Possible ICP / Unknown / Tech Vendor |
| Pre-Filter Score | Priority score from pre-filter |
Tools Required
- Apify API token — set as
APIFY_API_TOKENin.env - Apollo API key — set as
APOLLO_API_KEYin.env(for company enrichment) - Apify actors used:
harvestapi/linkedin-company-posts(post + engager scraping)
- Apollo endpoints used:
organizations/enrich(company industry/size lookup, 1 credit per company)
Example Usage
Trigger phrases:
- "Find leads engaging with [competitor]'s LinkedIn posts"
- "Scrape engagers from [company]'s top posts"
- "Who is interacting with [competitor]'s content?"
- "Run competitor-post-engagers for [company]"
Test mode:
python3 skills/competitor-post-engagers/scripts/competitor_post_engagers.py \
--config clients/<client>/campaigns/competitor-post-engagers/config.json --test --yes
Full run:
python3 skills/competitor-post-engagers/scripts/competitor_post_engagers.py \
--config clients/<client>/campaigns/competitor-post-engagers/config.json --yes
Files bundled with it
These load only when the skill asks for them, so they cost nothing until it runs.
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- competitor-profiling by coreyhaines31 · 45,947
- x-longform-post by ericosiu · 3,449
- competitor-analysis by OpenClaudia · 664
- competitor-monitoring by shawnpang · 308
- competitor-alternatives by louisblythe · 136
- competitor-mention-handling by louisblythe · 136
- post-meeting-follow-up-automation by louisblythe · 136
- competitor-ads-analyst by thatrebeccarae · 119
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what competitor-post-engagers does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.