Agent skill
gtmos-lifecycle-churn
Reduce churn: cancel flows and save offers, failed-payment recovery, health scoring and early-warning signals, and win-back.
Filed under Onboarding, retention and expansion.
From ay-automate/gtmos-skills · 107 skill entries · 0 · pushed 2026-11-02
What it does when it runs
Reduce churn: cancel flows and save offers, failed-payment recovery, health scoring and early-warning signals, and win-back. With GTM OS connected it reads product usage and engagement signals (product_analytics.sync, signals.list, journey.position), finds at-risk accounts from real data, and runs saves and win-backs through approval-gated outreach and plays. Use for \"churn\", \"reduce churn\", \"cancel flow\", \"save offer\", \"retention\", \"failed payments\", \"dunning\", \"health score\", \"win-back\", \"customers leaving\".
Automated analysis of the skill and the 2 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- None found.
- Hosts it reaches
- developer.paddle.com
- stripe.com
- support.gainsight.com
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound. - Actions present in the files
- None. Instructions only.
Ask about gtmos-lifecycle-churn
Opens your assistant with this page's recorded context. Check the linked sources before relying on it.
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/ay-automate/gtmos-skills.git /tmp/gtmos-skills git -C /tmp/gtmos-skills sparse-checkout set "skills/gtmos-lifecycle-churn" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/gtmos-lifecycle-churn cp -R "/tmp/gtmos-skills/skills/gtmos-lifecycle-churn/." ~/.claude/skills/gtmos-lifecycle-churn/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
Or take the whole library
This repo ships a .claude-plugin manifest, so Claude Code can install all 107 skills at once. Plugin skills are invoked as /<plugin>:<skill>, so they never collide with your own.
/plugin marketplace add ay-automate/gtmos-skills /plugin
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from ay-automate/gtmos-skills/blob/86780d2f545cdc0a1de971917aa04b41bb0b3ccd/skills/gtmos-lifecycle-churn/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (skill frontmatter). 2,956 words, 32 headings.
Churn prevention
Part of GTM OS Skills. Adapted from
churn-preventionin coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT, Copyright (c) 2025 Corey Haines). Changed for GTM OS: the operating section below, rewritten cross-references and tool pointers. Notices: THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md (installed beside the skills asTHIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md).
With GTM OS connected
Rules (GTMOS-RULES.md). Read
policy.get_dry_modefirst; in dry mode every effect stops at a draft. E-class operations are proposed and a different person approves them; never approve your own proposal. Numbers come only from operation results, named with the operation. Claims about results, customers or metrics must be backed by active proof fromproof.list.
1. Who is at risk. product_analytics.sync D refreshes usage; signals.list Q and signals.score Q per account; account.relationship Q for engagement; journey.position Q for lifecycle stage. Closed-lost and churned accounts: records.list with their reasons.
2. Why. Customer words from calls and replies: transcripts.list, replies.list, and voice.customer_language.list. Quote reasons with their source.
3. Act. Save and win-back messages go through the Outreach engine: drafts (outreach.draft_message) and approval-gated sends on an active lane. Recurring checks (usage drop, champion left) become plays: simulate first with play.simulate, then a person enables them. Discounts and offers must match what the org allows; never promise a term that is not in the brand voice or the offer you were given.
4. Measure honestly. Churn and save rates come from records and metric.evaluate; when the sample is small, say "not enough data yet".
Without GTM OS
Use billing and product data exports, follow the method below, and configure the flow in the user's billing and email tools.
You are an expert in SaaS retention and churn prevention. Your goal is to help reduce both voluntary churn (customers choosing to cancel) and involuntary churn (failed payments) through well-designed cancel flows, dynamic save offers, proactive retention, and dunning strategies.
Before Starting
Check for context first:
With GTM OS connected, read the org definitions named in With GTM OS connected above before asking anything. Without it, read .agents/product-marketing.md (or .claude/product-marketing.md) if it exists; gtmos-marketing-positioning writes that file. Ask only for what neither covers.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Current Churn Situation
- What's your monthly churn rate? (Voluntary vs. involuntary if known)
- How many active subscribers?
- What's the average MRR per customer?
- Do you have a cancel flow today, or does cancel happen instantly?
2. Billing & Platform
- What billing provider? (Stripe, Chargebee, Paddle, Recurly, Braintree)
- Monthly, annual, or both billing intervals?
- Do you support plan pausing or downgrades?
- Any existing retention tooling? (Churnkey, ProsperStack, Raaft)
3. Product & Usage Data
- Do you track feature usage per user?
- Can you identify engagement drop-offs?
- Do you have cancellation reason data from past churns?
- What's your activation metric? (What do retained users do that churned users don't?)
4. Constraints
- B2B or B2C? (Affects flow design)
- Self-serve cancellation required? (Some regulations mandate easy cancel)
- Brand tone for offboarding? (Empathetic, direct, playful)
How This Skill Works
Churn has two types requiring different strategies:
| Type | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Voluntary | Customer chooses to cancel | Cancel flows, save offers, exit surveys |
| Involuntary | Payment fails | Dunning emails, smart retries, card updaters |
Voluntary churn is typically 50-70% of total churn. Involuntary churn is 30-50% but is often easier to fix.
This skill supports three modes:
- Build a cancel flow — Design from scratch with survey, save offers, and confirmation
- Optimize an existing flow — Analyze cancel data and improve save rates
- Set up dunning — Failed payment recovery with retries and email sequences
Cancel Flow Design
The Cancel Flow Structure
Every cancel flow follows this sequence:
Trigger → Survey → Dynamic Offer → Confirmation → Post-Cancel
Step 1: Trigger Customer clicks "Cancel subscription" in account settings.
Step 2: Exit Survey Ask why they're cancelling. This determines which save offer to show.
Step 3: Dynamic Save Offer Present a targeted offer based on their reason (discount, pause, downgrade, etc.)
Step 4: Confirmation If they still want to cancel, confirm clearly with end-of-billing-period messaging.
Step 5: Post-Cancel Set expectations, offer easy reactivation path, trigger win-back sequence.
Exit Survey Design
The exit survey is the foundation. Good reason categories:
| Reason | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Too expensive | Price sensitivity, may respond to discount or downgrade |
| Not using it enough | Low engagement, may respond to pause or onboarding help |
| Missing a feature | Product gap, show roadmap or workaround |
| Switching to competitor | Competitive pressure, understand what they offer |
| Technical issues / bugs | Product quality, escalate to support |
| Temporary / seasonal need | Usage pattern, offer pause |
| Business closed / changed | Unavoidable, learn and let go gracefully |
| Other | Catch-all, include free text field |
Survey best practices:
- 1 question, single-select with optional free text
- 5-8 reason options max (avoid decision fatigue)
- Put most common reasons first (review data quarterly)
- Don't make it feel like a guilt trip
- "Help us improve" framing works better than "Why are you leaving?"
Dynamic Save Offers
The key insight: match the offer to the reason. A discount won't save someone who isn't using the product. A feature roadmap won't save someone who can't afford it.
Offer-to-reason mapping:
| Cancel Reason | Primary Offer | Fallback Offer |
|---|---|---|
| Too expensive | Discount (20-30% for 2-3 months) | Downgrade to lower plan |
| Not using it enough | Pause (1-3 months) | Free onboarding session |
| Missing feature | Roadmap preview + timeline | Workaround guide |
| Switching to competitor | Competitive comparison + discount | Feedback session |
| Technical issues | Escalate to support immediately | Credit + priority fix |
| Temporary / seasonal | Pause subscription | Downgrade temporarily |
| Business closed | Skip offer (respect the situation) | — |
Save Offer Types
Discount
- 20-30% off for 2-3 months is the sweet spot
- Avoid 50%+ discounts (trains customers to cancel for deals)
- Time-limit the offer ("This offer expires when you leave this page")
- Show the dollar amount saved, not just the percentage
Pause subscription
- 1-3 month pause maximum (longer pauses rarely reactivate)
- 60-80% of pausers eventually return to active
- Auto-reactivation with advance notice email
- Keep their data and settings intact
Plan downgrade
- Offer a lower tier instead of full cancellation
- Show what they keep vs. what they lose
- Position as "right-size your plan" not "downgrade"
- Easy path back up when ready
Feature unlock / extension
- Unlock a premium feature they haven't tried
- Extend trial of a higher tier
- Works best for "not getting enough value" reasons
Personal outreach
- For high-value accounts (top 10-20% by MRR)
- Route to customer success for a call
- Personal email from founder for smaller companies
Cancel Flow UI Patterns
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ We're sorry to see you go │
│ │
│ What's the main reason you're │
│ cancelling? │
│ │
│ ○ Too expensive │
│ ○ Not using it enough │
│ ○ Missing a feature I need │
│ ○ Switching to another tool │
│ ○ Technical issues │
│ ○ Temporary / don't need right now │
│ ○ Other: [____________] │
│ │
│ [Continue] │
│ [Never mind, keep my subscription] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ (selects "Too expensive")
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ What if we could help? │
│ │
│ We'd love to keep you. Here's a │
│ special offer: │
│ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ 25% off for the next 3 months│ │
│ │ Save $XX/month │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ [Accept Offer] │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Or switch to [Basic Plan] at │
│ $X/month → │
│ │
│ [No thanks, continue cancelling] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
UI principles:
- Keep the "continue cancelling" option visible (no dark patterns)
- One primary offer + one fallback, not a wall of options
- Show specific dollar savings, not abstract percentages
- Use the customer's name and account data when possible
- Mobile-friendly (many cancellations happen on mobile)
For detailed cancel flow patterns by industry and billing provider, see references/cancel-flow-patterns.md.
Churn Prediction & Proactive Retention
The best save happens before the customer ever clicks "Cancel."
Risk Signals
Track these leading indicators of churn:
| Signal | Risk Level | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Login frequency drops 50%+ | High | 2-4 weeks before cancel |
| Key feature usage stops | High | 1-3 weeks before cancel |
| Support tickets spike then stop | High | 1-2 weeks before cancel |
| Email open rates decline | Medium | 2-6 weeks before cancel |
| Billing page visits increase | High | Days before cancel |
| Team seats removed | High | 1-2 weeks before cancel |
| Data export initiated | Critical | Days before cancel |
| Individual recommendation rating is 0–6 (detractor) | Medium | 1-3 months before cancel |
Health Score Model
Build a simple health score (0-100) from weighted signals. Define every component on the same 0–100 scale, where higher means healthier, before applying weights. Use documented product-specific mappings for raw usage, sentiment, and billing values; do not add login counts, a 1–5 sentiment rating, and a percentage directly. The weights below are an illustrative starting point, not validated churn predictions.
Treat missing or stale signals as unavailable, rather than automatically healthy or zero. Set freshness windows and a minimum coverage policy before using the score. If the policy permits a partial score, compute sum(weight × observed score) / sum(observed weights) and report coverage (the sum of observed weights) alongside it; otherwise return “insufficient data.” All unavailable means no score. For example, only login (80) and feature usage (60) produce (0.30×80 + 0.25×60)/0.55 = 70.91, with 55% coverage. Do not promote that partial score into a healthy-account action without meeting the coverage policy.
An individual rating of 0–6 is a detractor; aggregate NPS (−100 to 100) is a different measure.
Gainsight's measure-weight documentation explains redistribution for unavailable measures.
Illustrative complete-data model:
Health Score = (
Login frequency score × 0.30 +
Feature usage score × 0.25 +
Support sentiment × 0.15 +
Billing health × 0.15 +
Engagement score × 0.15
)
Validate score mappings and intervention thresholds against later observed renewal/churn outcomes before operational use; the following tiers are illustrative.
| Score | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Healthy | Upsell opportunities |
| 60-79 | Needs attention | Proactive check-in |
| 40-59 | At risk | Intervention campaign |
| 0-39 | Critical | Personal outreach |
Proactive Interventions
Before they think about cancelling:
| Trigger | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Usage drop >50% for 2 weeks | "We noticed you haven't used [feature]. Need help?" email |
| Approaching plan limit | Upgrade nudge (not a wall — paywalls handles this) |
| No login for 14 days | Re-engagement email with recent product updates |
| NPS detractor (0-6) | Personal follow-up within 24 hours |
| Support ticket unresolved >48h | Escalation + proactive status update |
| Annual renewal in 30 days | Value recap email + renewal confirmation |
Involuntary Churn: Payment Recovery
Failed payments cause 30-50% of all churn but are the most recoverable.
The Dunning Stack
Pre-dunning → Smart retry → Dunning emails → Grace period → Hard cancel
Pre-Dunning (Prevent Failures)
- Card expiry alerts: Email 30, 15, and 7 days before card expires
- Backup payment method: Prompt for a second payment method at signup
- Card updater services: Visa/Mastercard auto-update programs (reduces hard declines 30-50%)
- Pre-billing notification: Email 3-5 days before charge for annual plans
Smart Retry Logic
Not all failures are the same. Retry strategy by decline type:
| Decline Type | Examples | Retry Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Soft decline (temporary) | Insufficient funds, processor timeout | Retry 3-5 times over 7-10 days |
| Hard decline (permanent) | Card stolen, account closed | Don't retry — ask for new card |
| Authentication required | 3D Secure, SCA | Send customer to update payment |
Retry timing best practices:
- Retry 1: 24 hours after failure
- Retry 2: 3 days after failure
- Retry 3: 5 days after failure
- Retry 4: 7 days after failure (with dunning email escalation)
- After 4 retries: Hard cancel with reactivation path
Smart retry tip: Retry on the day of the month the payment originally succeeded (if Day 1 worked before, retry on Day 1). Stripe Smart Retries handles this automatically.
Dunning Email Sequence
| Timing | Tone | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Day 0 (failure) | Friendly alert | "Your payment didn't go through. Update your card." |
| 2 | Day 3 | Helpful reminder | "Quick reminder — update your payment to keep access." |
| 3 | Day 7 | Urgency | "Your account will be paused in 3 days. Update now." |
| 4 | Day 10 | Final warning | "Last chance to keep your account active." |
Dunning email best practices:
- Direct link to payment update page (no login required if possible)
- Show what they'll lose (their data, their team's access)
- Don't blame ("your payment failed" not "you failed to pay")
- Include support contact for help
- Plain text performs better than designed emails for dunning
Recovery Benchmarks
| Metric | Poor | Average | Good |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft decline recovery | <40% | 50-60% | 70%+ |
| Hard decline recovery | <10% | 20-30% | 40%+ |
| Overall payment recovery | <30% | 40-50% | 60%+ |
| Pre-dunning prevention | None | 10-15% | 20-30% |
For the complete dunning playbook with provider-specific setup, see references/dunning-playbook.md.
Metrics & Measurement
Key Churn Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly churn rate | Churned customers / Start-of-month customers | <5% B2C, <2% B2B |
| Revenue churn (net) | (Lost MRR - Expansion MRR) / Start MRR | Negative (net expansion) |
| Cancel flow save rate | Saved / Total cancel sessions | 25-35% |
| Offer acceptance rate | Accepted offers / Shown offers | 15-25% |
| Pause reactivation rate | Reactivated / Total paused | 60-80% |
| Dunning recovery rate | Recovered / Total failed payments | 50-60% |
| Time to cancel | Days from first churn signal to cancel | Track trend |
Cohort Analysis
Segment churn by:
- Acquisition channel — Which channels bring stickier customers?
- Plan type — Which plans churn most?
- Tenure — When do most cancellations happen? (30, 60, 90 days?)
- Cancel reason — Which reasons are growing?
- Save offer type — Which offers work best for which segments?
Cancel Flow A/B Tests
Test one variable at a time:
| Test | Hypothesis | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Discount % (20% vs 30%) | Higher discount saves more | Save rate, LTV impact |
| Pause duration (1 vs 3 months) | Longer pause increases return rate | Reactivation rate |
| Survey placement (before vs after offer) | Survey-first personalizes offers | Save rate |
| Offer presentation (modal vs full page) | Full page gets more attention | Save rate |
| Copy tone (empathetic vs direct) | Empathetic reduces friction | Save rate |
How to run cancel flow experiments: Use the gtmos-analytics-experiments skill to design statistically rigorous tests. PostHog is a good fit for cancel flow experiments — its feature flags can split users into different flows server-side, and its funnel analytics track each step of the cancel flow (survey → offer → accept/decline → confirm). See the PostHog integration guide for setup.
Common Mistakes
- No cancel flow at all — Instant cancel leaves money on the table. Even a simple survey + one offer saves 10-15%
- Making cancellation hard to find — Hidden cancel buttons breed resentment and bad reviews. Many jurisdictions require easy cancellation (FTC Click-to-Cancel rule)
- Same offer for every reason — A blanket discount doesn't address "missing feature" or "not using it"
- Discounts too deep — 50%+ discounts train customers to cancel-and-return for deals
- Ignoring involuntary churn — Often 30-50% of total churn and the easiest to fix
- No dunning emails — Letting payment failures silently cancel accounts
- Guilt-trip copy — "Are you sure you want to abandon us?" damages brand trust
- Not tracking save offer LTV — A "saved" customer who churns 30 days later wasn't really saved
- Pausing too long — Pauses beyond 3 months rarely reactivate. Set limits.
- No post-cancel path — Make reactivation easy and trigger win-back emails, because some churned users will want to come back
Tools
With GTM OS connected, run this work through the connectors and operations in With GTM OS connected; they keep approvals, dry mode, spend caps and provenance in force. Without GTM OS, the upstream tools registry lists setup guides for common tools.
Related Skills
- gtmos-lifecycle-email: For win-back email sequences after cancellation
- gtmos-analytics-tracking: For setting up churn signal events
- gtmos-analytics-experiments: For testing cancel flow variations with statistical rigor
Files bundled with it
These load only when the skill asks for them, so they cost nothing until it runs.
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- churn-prevention by coreyhaines31 · 57,918
- inbox-lifecycle-manager by growthenginenowoslawski · 797
- churn-analysis by shawnpang · 374
- retention-churn-prevention by thatrebeccarae · 189
- lifecycle-marketing-campaigns by realjaymes · 68
- churn-early-warning by GTMify · 25
- churn-save by etrebels · 21
- churn-prevention by zime-ai · 19
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what gtmos-lifecycle-churn does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.