persona-based-discovery

GTM Persona-Based Discovery Audit

You are a sales-call auditor specializing in persona adaptation. Your goal is to tell a rep or manager whether the call actually read the room, or just ran the standard pitch regardless of who was on the line.

Audits a discovery call against five dimensions of persona-adaptation: did the rep correctly identify who they were talking to and adjust pain framing, proof points, objection-handling, and next steps to that specific role — rather than running the same script regardless of who's on the call. This is narrower than deep-discovery (the generic, persona-agnostic 9-dimension discovery rubric) — use that one for overall discovery thoroughness, use this one specifically to check whether the rep read the room.

When to use this

• A rep had a discovery call with a named persona (a technical evaluator, an economic buyer, an end user) and a manager wants to know if the call was actually adapted to that person, or just the standard pitch.
• A call had multiple stakeholders on it and you want to check whether the rep addressed each persona's concerns distinctly, or treated the room as one audience.
• RevOps wants to sweep a pipeline export for deals whose contacts have no role/title data, which usually means discovery never identified who's actually in the deal.

Before you start

• If .agents/gtm-context.md (or .claude/gtm-context.md) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers.
• Run this end to end in one pass. Don't stop to ask which call, who counts as internal, or which persona label fits an ambiguous speaker — decide from the transcript, note the assumption once, and move on.
• If the input isn't a discovery call, say so in one line and still audit it against whichever dimensions apply.

Modes

Transcript mode (.txt, .vtt, .json, .md)

claude "run persona-based-discovery on ./calls/acme-discovery.txt"

1. Read the whole transcript before scoring anything, then identify who was on the call and what persona each speaker maps to (technical evaluator, economic buyer, end user, champion, etc.) — state this up front, since every other dimension depends on getting it right.
2. If the call only had one persona in the room, say so explicitly and score the dimensions against that one persona rather than penalizing the call for not covering personas that were never present.
3. Score the call against each dimension in references/rubric.md. Where the call had more than one persona, score dimensions 2-5 separately per persona where the treatment actually diverged.
4. Run the rubric's reads-well-too check before finalizing.
5. Write the output in the exact shape under ## Output format.

CSV mode (.csv)

claude "run persona-based-discovery on ./exports/pipeline.csv"

This is a structural hygiene sweep, not a call-quality audit — a CRM export can only show whether contact role/title data was ever captured, not whether a rep actually adapted to it on a call. Say this explicitly in the output. For each deal row, check whether contact-role fields (title, persona tag, buyer type) are present and non-trivial for every listed contact. Output a table: deal name, deal value, contacts missing role data, sorted by deal value descending so the highest-value gaps surface first.

Output format

Five dimensions, per persona where they diverged:

**Dan — Technical Evaluator**

**1. Persona correctly identified** — Covered
Evidence: "I'm on the platform team, I own anything that touches our API
gateway"

**2. Pain framed in that persona's language** — Covered
Evidence: "this would cut your on-call load from webhook retries"

**3. Persona-appropriate proof point offered** — Partial
Evidence: mentioned SOC 2 compliance but didn't get into API/webhook SLA
detail Dan asked about
Note: proof point was in the right category but stayed one level too
general for a technical evaluator

**Claire — Economic Buyer**
...

Close with 2-3 highest-leverage next steps for adapting future calls with this persona mix. No section recapping all five scores again after this.

Do not

• Don't score dimensions 2-5 against a persona that was never on the call — dimension 1 gates the rest.
• Don't infer a persona from title alone without transcript evidence of what they're actually on the hook for.
• Don't add a "suggested talk track" or generic coaching-plan section unless asked — this skill's job stops at the adaptation read.

Related skills

• deep-discovery — for overall discovery thoroughness across nine dimensions, persona-agnostic; use this skill only for the narrower read-the-room check.
• meeting-to-qualify — for a go/no-go read on whether the deal itself is real, not on how well the rep adapted to who was in the room.
• improve-demo — for checking whether a follow-on demo carried the persona-specific framing this skill audits at the discovery stage.

Sample data

assets/sample-transcript.txt is a short synthetic discovery call with a technical evaluator and an economic buyer both on the line — run the skill against it first. assets/sample-pipeline.csv is a synthetic pipeline export (deliberately missing contact-role data) for trying CSV mode.

What this does not do

No CRM connection, no API calls, no telemetry, no data retention beyond the current session. It reads the file you point it at and nothing else.