Agent skill
negotiation-pipeline-check
Sweeps a deal/pipeline export for deals in negotiation with no paper process started, no named approver on a discount, no credible close date, or no named signature path.
Filed under Calls, demos and discovery.
From zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills · 41 skills · 14 · pushed 2026-08-26
What it does when it runs
Sweeps a deal/pipeline export for deals in negotiation with no paper process started, no named approver on a discount, no credible close date, or no named signature path. Use when reviewing forecast-stage negotiation deals for whether they have a real mechanical path to signature, not just a stated intent to close.
Read from the skill and the 3 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- None found.
- Hosts it reaches
- No third-party host appears in the skill or its bundled files.
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound. - Actions present in the files
- None. Instructions only.
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills.git /tmp/zime-gtm-skills git -C /tmp/zime-gtm-skills sparse-checkout set "skills/negotiation-pipeline-check" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/negotiation-pipeline-check cp -R "/tmp/zime-gtm-skills/skills/negotiation-pipeline-check/." ~/.claude/skills/negotiation-pipeline-check/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
Or take the whole library
This repo ships a .claude-plugin manifest, so Claude Code can install all 41 skills at once. Plugin skills are invoked as /<plugin>:<skill>, so they never collide with your own.
/plugin marketplace add zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills /plugin
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills/blob/4f134175badd08302f070c77449822c48403eeb1/skills/negotiation-pipeline-check/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (skill frontmatter). 751 words, 12 headings.
Negotiation Pipeline Check
You are a pipeline-hygiene auditor. Sweep a deal export for deals sitting
in negotiation with no mechanical path to a signature — no paper started,
no approver on a discount, no credible close date, no mutual close plan,
no named signer. This never reads a call transcript; negotiation-closing
audits the negotiation conversation for tactics and concessions, this
skill only asks whether the forecast rows in negotiation stage have the
structural pieces a deal needs to actually close.
Before you start
- If
.agents/gtm-context.md(or.claude/gtm-context.md) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers. - Run this end to end in one pass — don't stop to ask which stage label to
match or what counts as a stale close date; apply the defaults in
references/rubric.md, decide, and note the assumption once. - If the in-scope filter returns zero negotiation-stage rows, say so plainly and stop rather than forcing a check onto rows that don't exist.
When to use this
- RevOps or a manager reviewing the negotiation-stage forecast for deals that are "verbally close" but have no paper, approver, or close-date discipline behind them.
- A rep or manager sanity-checking their own negotiation-stage deals before a forecast call.
- Spotting discount requests moving without an approver before they reach legal/finance.
Step 1: Choose an input source
CSV mode (default) — read the .csv file the user points at directly.
Connector mode — if this conversation has a tool that can list opportunities/deals, use it instead and treat the returned rows exactly like CSV rows. If both are available, ask the user which to use; otherwise proceed on whichever exists without asking.
There is no transcript mode in this skill.
Step 2: Column detection
Match headers case-insensitively, ignoring _/-/space differences.
Accept the synonyms listed in references/rubric.md. If a column a check
needs is absent, that check reports Unknown (column missing) for every
row — state this once, up front, and never infer a missing column's value
from another column.
Step 3: Filter to negotiation stage
Keep rows whose stage column fuzzy-matches "negotiation" (e.g.
negotiation, negotiating, contract, legal review — see
references/rubric.md for the exact match list). Report how many rows were
in scope out of the export's total row count.
Step 4: Run the six checks
Score every in-scope row against the six checks in references/rubric.md.
Each check returns Flagged, Clean, or Unknown. Every flagged
deal must cite the column name and the actual cell value that triggered the
flag (e.g. close_date = 2026-01-14, approver = (empty)) — a flag with
no cited cell does not ship. Check 3 (discount without approval) computes
the median discount across in-scope rows from the export itself; never use
a hardcoded discount ceiling.
Run the reads-well-too check from references/rubric.md first if working
against the sample data: it must return at least two deals fully Clean.
Step 5: Output
One markdown table, flagged deals first, most flags first:
| Deal | Flags | Evidence | Suggested action |
|---|
Then two closing lines:
N of M deals in negotiation flagged- The single most common flag across the flagged deals.
Nothing else — no scores, no letter grades, no percentages invented from nothing.
Run this end to end in one pass. Don't stop to ask which stage label to
match or what counts as a stale close date — apply the defaults in
references/rubric.md, decide, and note the assumption once.
Sample data
assets/sample-pipeline-negotiation-pipeline-check.csv — a synthetic
10-row pipeline export mixing flagged and healthy negotiation-stage deals.
Run the skill against it first:
claude "run negotiation-pipeline-check on skills/negotiation-pipeline-check/assets/sample-pipeline-negotiation-pipeline-check.csv"
Do not
- Don't blend the six checks into one score or letter grade — the output is a flag list with cited evidence, not a rating.
- Don't hardcode a discount ceiling — compute the median discount from the export itself, per check 3.
- Don't infer a missing column's value from another column; report Unknown and move on.
Related skills
negotiation-closingaudits the negotiation conversation itself (tactics, concessions); this skill sweeps the pipeline's negotiation-stage rows instead.won-pipeline-checkpicks up once a deal actually closes, checking the handoff data rather than the path to signature.
What this does not do
No CRM connection, no API calls, no telemetry, no data retention beyond the current session. It reads the file(s) you point it at (or what a connector already present in the conversation returns) and nothing else.
Files bundled with it
These load only when the skill asks for them, so they cost nothing until it runs.
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- podcast-pipeline by ericosiu · 3,449
- sales-pipeline by ericosiu · 3,449
- short-form-pipeline by ericosiu · 3,449
- pipeline-reviewer by janskuba · 199
- negotiation by louisblythe · 136
- pipeline-management by louisblythe · 136
- pricing-negotiation by louisblythe · 136
- content-pipeline by thatrebeccarae · 119
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what negotiation-pipeline-check does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.