Systems Lab

Agent skill

lead-scoring

Design lead scoring models using firmographic, behavioral, and custom data signals

activeReaches the webInstructions only775 words

Filed under Prospecting and list building.

From jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills · 55 skill entries · 0 · pushed 2026-10-04

What it does when it runs

Design lead scoring models using firmographic, behavioral, and custom data signals

Automated analysis of the skill and the 0 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.

Keys and connectors you must supply
None found.
Hosts it reaches
  • blueprintgtm.com
Tool permissions it declares
No allowed-tools in the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound.
Actions present in the files
None. Instructions only.

Ask about lead-scoring

Opens your assistant with this page's verified links already in the prompt.

Is this safe to install?ClaudeChatGPT
Adapt it to my stackClaudeChatGPT
What else do I need for it to workClaudeChatGPT
Rather ask a human? Talk to Cheetah
git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills.git /tmp/gtmskills
git -C /tmp/gtmskills sparse-checkout set "skills/lead-scoring"
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/lead-scoring
cp -R "/tmp/gtmskills/skills/lead-scoring/." ~/.claude/skills/lead-scoring/

Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗

The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.

Reproduced in full from jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills/blob/77dc0b3112dbf6cf906dfc3d526b6f7031bf964c/skills/lead-scoring/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (repository). 775 words, 11 headings.

Lead Scoring Model Design

You are designing lead scoring models that prioritize prospects based on fit, intent, and custom signals.

Input

User provides:

  • ICP definition or target criteria
  • Available data fields
  • Optionally: historical win/loss data
  • Optionally: sales team input on what matters

Process

  1. Identify Scoring Dimensions

    Three Pillars:

    • Fit Score: Do they match our ICP? (firmographics, technographics)
    • Intent Score: Are they showing buying signals? (behavior, timing)
    • Custom Score: Do they have our predictive indicators? (tension heuristics)
  2. Define Scoring Rules

    Prompt Pattern:

    For this ICP: [DESCRIPTION]
    With these available data fields: [FIELDS]
    
    Create scoring rules across three dimensions:
    
    FIT (demographic match):
    - What criteria indicate strong fit?
    - What's a disqualifier?
    
    INTENT (buying signals):
    - What behaviors indicate interest?
    - What timing signals matter?
    
    CUSTOM (predictive indicators):
    - What non-standard signals predict success?
    - What patterns appear in best customers?
    
  3. Output Format

    ## Lead Scoring Model: [Name]
    
    ### Scoring Dimensions
    
    **Fit Score (0-40 points)**
    | Criterion | Points | Rationale |
    |-----------|--------|-----------|
    | [Criterion 1] | +[X] | [Why] |
    | [Criterion 2] | +[X] | [Why] |
    | [Disqualifier] | -[X] | [Why] |
    
    **Intent Score (0-30 points)**
    | Signal | Points | Rationale |
    |--------|--------|-----------|
    | [Signal 1] | +[X] | [Why] |
    | [Signal 2] | +[X] | [Why] |
    
    **Custom Score (0-30 points)**
    | Indicator | Points | Rationale |
    |-----------|--------|-----------|
    | [Custom 1] | +[X] | [Why] |
    | [Custom 2] | +[X] | [Why] |
    
    ### Score Interpretation
    
    | Score Range | Priority | Action |
    |-------------|----------|--------|
    | 80-100 | Hot | Immediate AE outreach |
    | 60-79 | Warm | SDR sequence |
    | 40-59 | Nurture | Marketing automation |
    | <40 | Low | Deprioritize |
    
    ### Implementation
    
    **Data Requirements:**
    - [Field 1]: [Source]
    - [Field 2]: [Source]
    
    **Scoring Formula:**
    Total = Fit + Intent + Custom
    
    **Update Frequency:**
    - Fit: On data change
    - Intent: Real-time (behavior) or weekly (signals)
    - Custom: Per enrichment cycle
    

Example

Input: "B2B SaaS selling to marketing teams. ICP is 200-2000 employees, using HubSpot or Marketo."

Output:

## Lead Scoring Model: Marketing SaaS Fit

### Scoring Dimensions

**Fit Score (0-40 points)**
| Criterion | Points | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| 200-2000 employees | +15 | Sweet spot for our solution |
| Uses HubSpot or Marketo | +15 | Tech stack fit |
| Marketing team 5+ | +10 | Budget and need |
| B2B company | +5 | Our focus |
| <50 employees | -20 | Too small |
| No marketing tech | -10 | Likely not ready |

**Intent Score (0-30 points)**
| Signal | Points | Rationale |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Visited pricing page | +15 | High intent |
| Downloaded resource | +10 | Engaged |
| Marketing job posting | +10 | Investing in function |
| Competitor mentioned | +5 | In market |
| Attended webinar | +5 | Active interest |

**Custom Score (0-30 points)**
| Indicator | Points | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Recent funding (6 mo) | +15 | Budget available |
| New CMO/VP Marketing | +10 | Fresh mandate |
| Multiple marketing tools | +5 | Complexity = need |
| Agency on team page | -5 | May outsource |

### Score Interpretation

| Score Range | Priority | Action |
|-------------|----------|--------|
| 80-100 | Hot | AE call within 24h |
| 60-79 | Warm | SDR 5-touch sequence |
| 40-59 | Nurture | Weekly email digest |
| <40 | Low | Quarterly check-in |

### Implementation

**Data Requirements:**
- Employee count: Clearbit/Apollo
- Tech stack: BuiltWith/HG Insights
- Job postings: LinkedIn/Indeed scrape
- Funding: Crunchbase
- Page visits: HubSpot/Segment

**Scoring Formula:**
Total = Fit (max 40) + Intent (max 30) + Custom (max 30)

**Update Frequency:**
- Fit: On data enrichment
- Intent: Real-time from website
- Custom: Weekly signal refresh

Best Practices

  1. Start Simple: 5-7 rules, not 50
  2. Validate with Sales: Do scores match their intuition?
  3. Test with Historical Data: Do high scores correlate with wins?
  4. Iterate Monthly: Refine based on results

Related Skills

  • /pain-qualified-segment - Tension-based scoring inputs
  • /data-point-research - Custom signals to include
  • /company-goals - Intent from hiring
  • /recent-news - Timing signals

Credits

The tension-heuristic idea used for custom signals comes from Jordan Crawford (Blueprint GTM).


Examples are illustrative. Company names, prices and numbers in them are placeholders or may be out of date, so check the live source before you rely on any detail.

Other skills for the same job

Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.

Need help setting it up?

This page tells you what lead-scoring does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.

Book a call →

The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.