Agent skill
data-point-research
Design custom data points that predict fit but can't be bought from standard providers
From jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills · 55 skill entries · 0 · pushed 2026-10-04
What it does when it runs
Design custom data points that predict fit but can't be bought from standard providers
Automated analysis of the skill and the 0 files bundled beside it. A skill’s own description is written to be selected by an agent, so it describes the job and not the dependencies.
- Keys and connectors you must supply
- None found.
- Hosts it reaches
- No third-party host appears in the skill or its bundled files.
- Tool permissions it declares
- No
allowed-toolsin the frontmatter. It only issues instructions, so there is nothing to bound. - Actions present in the files
- None. Instructions only.
Install it
View source on GitHub ↗git clone --depth 1 --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills.git /tmp/gtmskills git -C /tmp/gtmskills sparse-checkout set "skills/data-point-research" mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/data-point-research cp -R "/tmp/gtmskills/skills/data-point-research/." ~/.claude/skills/data-point-research/
Picked up without a restart. A project skill of the same name is shadowed by your personal one. For one repository only, swap ~/.claude/skills for .claude/skills. Claude Code docs ↗
The folder is the same in every client that implements the format — 46 of them — so if yours is not above, only the destination changes.
The skill
Source on GitHub ↗Reproduced in full from jurjen-gtm-engineer/gtmskills/blob/77dc0b3112dbf6cf906dfc3d526b6f7031bf964c/skills/data-point-research/SKILL.md, which is licensed MIT (repository). 888 words, 14 headings.
Data Point Research
You are designing custom data points that predict customer fit, signals that can't be bought from standard data providers but can be researched or inferred.
Core Concept
Build data you can't buy.
Standard data: Employee count, industry, funding stage Custom data: "Has free trial option", "Support team > 20 people", "Uses competitor X"
Input
User provides:
- Their ICP or target segment
- What their product does / pain it solves
- Optionally: existing customer patterns to analyze
Process
-
Identify Predictive Signals
Prompt Pattern:
For a company selling [PRODUCT/SERVICE] to [ICP]: What specific, non-standard data points would strongly predict fit? Think about: - Website indicators (features, pages, content) - Hiring patterns (specific roles, urgency) - Tech stack combinations (not just "uses Salesforce") - Business model indicators (pricing model, customer type) - Operational signals (support structure, team ratios) -
Design Detection Methods
For each data point, define:
- What to look for
- Where to find it
- How to validate it
-
Output Format
## Custom Data Points for [ICP/Product] ### High-Signal Data Points | Data Point | Why It Predicts Fit | Detection Method | |------------|---------------------|------------------| | [Point 1] | [Reason] | [How to find] | | [Point 2] | [Reason] | [How to find] | ### Detection Playbooks #### Data Point: [Name] **What to Look For:** - [Specific indicator 1] - [Specific indicator 2] **Where to Find It:** - [Source 1]: [What to check] - [Source 2]: [What to check] **Claygent/AI Prompt:**Visit [URL pattern]. Look for [specific element]. Return: [Yes/No/Value] based on [criteria]. If not found, return "Not found".
**Validation:** - Manual spot-check: [What to verify] - False positive risk: [High/Medium/Low] ### Scoring Model | Data Point | Weight | Reason | |------------|--------|--------| | [Point 1] | [+X] | [Why weighted this way] | | [Point 2] | [+X] | [Why weighted this way] | Total threshold for "High Fit": [Score]
Examples
Input: "We sell AI customer service software. Best customers have high support volume and are PLG."
Output:
## Custom Data Points for AI Support Software
### High-Signal Data Points
| Data Point | Why It Predicts Fit | Detection Method |
|------------|---------------------|------------------|
| Has free trial/freemium | Indicates PLG model, high volume | Website pricing page |
| Support team size > 20 | High support volume | LinkedIn search, job postings |
| CS job postings | Active investment in support | Job board scraping |
| Login button on homepage | Has end-user product | Website scan |
| Multiple pricing tiers | PLG with expansion potential | Pricing page analysis |
| "Help center" or "Support" prominent | Support is key function | Website structure |
### Detection Playbooks
#### Data Point: Has Free Trial / PLG Model
**What to Look For:**
- "Free trial" or "Try free" CTA
- "Freemium" mentioned
- Self-serve signup flow
- Credit card not required messaging
**Where to Find It:**
- Homepage: CTAs and hero section
- Pricing page: Tier structure
- Sign-up flow: Self-serve vs "Contact sales" only
**Claygent/AI Prompt:**
Visit {{Company Website}}/pricing (or homepage if no pricing page). Does this company offer a free trial or freemium tier? Look for: "free trial", "try free", "freemium", "$0", "no credit card" Return: "Yes - [type]" if found, "No - Sales-led only" if contact sales only, "Unknown" if unclear.
**Validation:**
- Manual spot-check: Visit 10 companies, verify accuracy
- False positive risk: Low (clear signals)
#### Data Point: Support Team Size > 20
**What to Look For:**
- Number of people with "Support", "Customer Success", "Help Desk" in title
- Support-related job postings volume
**Where to Find It:**
- LinkedIn: Company page → People → Filter by title keywords
- Job boards: Search "[Company] support" or "customer success"
**Claygent/AI Prompt:**
Search LinkedIn for [Company] employees with titles containing: "Support", "Customer Success", "Help Desk", "Customer Service" Return approximate count: "<10", "10-20", "20-50", "50+" If unable to determine, return "Unknown".
**Validation:**
- Cross-reference with company size (ratio check)
- False positive risk: Medium (title variations)
### Scoring Model
| Data Point | Weight | Reason |
|------------|--------|--------|
| Free trial/PLG | +30 | Core ICP indicator |
| Support team 20+ | +25 | Volume signal |
| CS job postings | +20 | Active investment |
| Login on homepage | +15 | End-user product |
| Multiple pricing tiers | +10 | PLG indicator |
Total threshold for "High Fit": 60+
Key Principles
-
Specific > Generic: "Has free trial" beats "is SaaS"
-
Detectable > Theoretical: If you can't find it reliably, it's not useful
-
Predictive > Descriptive: Focus on what correlates with becoming a customer
-
Validated > Assumed: Test with actual customer data
Related Skills
/pain-qualified-segment- Use data points to define segments/company-goals- Job postings as data source/saas-identification- One type of custom classification/ideal-customer-profiles- Connect data points to ICP
Credits
"Build data you can't buy" is Petra Hajal's line and approach. The prompts and wording here are ours.
Examples are illustrative. Company names, prices and numbers in them are placeholders or may be out of date, so check the live source before you rely on any detail.
Other skills for the same job
Different authors, same problem. Matched on the words in the skill name, across every library in the catalogue except this one.
- customer-research by coreyhaines31 · 53,460
- icp-research-assistant by irinabuht12-oss · 3,698
- sales-research by zubair-trabzada · 1,407
- geo-content-research by onvoyage-ai · 1,319
- reddit-opportunity-research by onvoyage-ai · 1,319
- research-brand by onvoyage-ai · 1,319
- research-keywords by onvoyage-ai · 1,319
- auto-research-public by growthenginenowoslawski · 739
Need help setting it up?
This page tells you what data-point-research does and what it needs. Cheetah builds the agent setup it runs inside: data, CRM, sequencing and the guardrails.
Book a call →The directory stays free. There is nothing gated behind this.